Photo
Credit: Richard Drew, AP
Jonathan Briley was the falling man of 9/11 and one of 200
jumpers who leaped to their deaths on that infamous day in 2001. His image
captured by Richard Drew continues to shock and it still demands the truth and
justice for those who perpetrated or allowed this treasonous operation and
carefully orchestrated cover up to occur: Allen L Roland
The
most despicable act of American treason was the 9/11 official attack storyline and
carefully orchestrated cover up which continues to this day. The Obama
administration is still determined to keep
this bamboozle covered up and is, as such, is complicit
in hiding the truth of 9/11.
Nothing
captures the sheer horror of that day more graphically than Richard Drew’s
photo of the falling man ~ later identified as Jonathan Briley.
Two
years ago, the New York Post published a
9/11 macabre human remains map in trying to determine the physical scope of
ground Zero as well as the human deaths, which obviously includes the over 200
Trade Tower jumpers along with the falling man, Jonathan Briley.
New
York Post human remains map of 9/11.
This
New York post map is a graphic illustration of the human cost of that day for
each red dot is a human being who was loved and cherished by someone and became
an unnecessary victim of the most treasonous act in American history.
I
watched again last night the brilliant and moving (70 minute) video THE
FALLING MAN which has still not been released in the U.S. and which can be
seen by clicking on ~ http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17405.htm .
Note
also in this video at the 23:48 minute mark ~ detonation flashes are
clearly seen below the smoke as the North Tower begins its collapse.
Is
there a technology that can liquify
structural
steel
in seconds?
Yes,
there is ~ Military-grade Nano thermite
and
it's fully explained here in 6 minute video .
Hundreds
of eye witnesses reported numerous explosions
inside
the Twin Towers on 9/11.
The
news media did an epic job of not following up
with
any of them. Government studies ignored
them
entirely.
10
minute Video:
It
was Carl Sagan who wrote ~ " One of the saddest lessons of history
is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence
of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The
bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge ~ even to
ourselves ~ that we've been so credulous. So the old bamboozles tend to persist
as the new bamboozles rise."
The
9/11 cover up is America's greatest bamboozle and many Americans are apparently
no longer interested in finding the truth ~ for it would indeed be too painful
to acknowledge.
But
here are some facts to ponder on the 11th
anniversary of 9/11 ~
The
9/11 Commission's co-chairs said that the 9/11 Commissioners knew that military
officials misrepresented the facts to the Commission, and the Commission
considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements .
9/11
Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says "I don't believe for a minute
we got everything right", and still believes
that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking
questions about 9/11, and that the 9/11 debate should continue.
9/11
Commissioner Timothy Roemer said "We were extremely frustrated with
the false statements we were getting"
9/11
Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: "It
is a national scandal"; "This investigation is now compromised";
and "One of these days we will have to get the full story
because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants
to cover it up"
9/11
Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that "There are ample reasons to
suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version .
. . We didn't have access . . . ." He
also said that the investigation depended too heavily on the accounts of Al
Qaeda detainees who were physically coerced (
tortured ) into talking ( My note
~ this was Dick Cheney's trip to the dark side to cover up White
House involvement )
And
the Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) - who led the 9/11
staff's inquiry - said "At some level of the government, at some
point in time...there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what
happened". He also said "I was shocked at how different the truth was
from the way it was described .... The tapes told a radically different story
from what had been told to us and the public for two years.... This is not
spin. This is not true." And he said: "It's almost a
culture of concealment, for lack of a better word. There were interviews made
at the FAA's New York center the night of 9/11 and those tapes were destroyed.
The CIA tapes of the interrogations were destroyed. The story of 9/11 itself,
to put it mildly, was distorted and was completely different from the way
things happened"
If
even the 9/11 Commissioners don't buy the official story, why should anyone?
Senior
intelligence officers:
Former
military analyst and famed whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg said that the case of
a certain 9/11 whistleblower is "far more explosive than the
Pentagon Papers". He also said that the government is ordering the
media to cover up her allegations about 9/11. And he said that some of the
claims concerning government involvement in 9/11 are credible, that "very
serious questions have been raised about what they [U.S. government officials]
knew beforehand and how much involvement there might have been", that
engineering 9/11 would not be humanly or psychologically beyond the scope of
the current administration, and that there's enough evidence to justify a new,
"hard-hitting" investigation into 9/11 with subpoenas and
testimony taken under oath.
A
27-year CIA veteran, who chaired National Intelligence Estimates and personally
delivered intelligence briefings to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W.
Bush, their Vice Presidents, Secretaries of State, the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
and many other senior government officials (Raymond McGovern) said “I
think at simplest terms, there’s a cover-up. The 9/11 Report is a joke”
A
29-year CIA veteran, former National Intelligence Officer (NIO) and former
Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and Political Analysis (William Bill
Christison) said “I now think there is persuasive evidence that the
events of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and the 9/11
Commission would have us believe."
A
number of intelligence officials, including a CIA Operations Officer who
co-chaired a CIA multi-agency task force coordinating intelligence efforts
among many intelligence and law enforcement agencies (Lynne Larkin) sent a
joint letter to Congress expressing their concerns about “serious
shortcomings,” “omissions,” and “major flaws” in
the 9/11 Commission Report and offering their services for a new investigation
(they were ignored)
A
decorated 20-year CIA veteran, who Pulitzer-Prize winning investigative
reporter Seymour Hersh called "perhaps the best on-the-ground field
officer in the Middle East”, and whose astounding career formed the
script for the Academy Award winning motion picture Syriana (Robert Baer) said
that "the evidence points at" 9/11 having had aspects of being
an inside job."
The
Division Chief of the CIA’s Office of Soviet Affairs, who served as Senior
Analyst from 1966 - 1990. He also served as Professor of International Security
at the National War College from 1986 - 2004 (Melvin Goodman) said "The
final 9/11 Commission] report is ultimately a cover-up"
If
even our country's top intelligence officers don't buy the official story, why
should anyone ?
Congressmen:
According
to the Co-Chair of the Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 and former Head of the
Senate Intelligence Committee, Bob Graham, an FBI informant had hosted and
rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when the Inquiry sought to
interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an
unknown location, and that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking
maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House ( Dick Cheney again ? )
Current
Democratic U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy said "The two questions that
the congress will not ask . . . is why did 9/11 happen on George Bush's watch
when he had clear warnings that it was going to happen? Why did they allow it
to happen?"
Current
Republican Congressman Ron Paul calls for a new 9/11 investigation and states
that "we see the [9/11] investigations that have been done so far as
more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on"
Former
Democratic Senator Mike Gravel states that he supports a new 9/11 investigation
and that we don't know the truth about 9/11
Former
Republican Senator Lincoln Chaffee endorses a new 9/11 investigation.
Former
U.S. Democratic Congressman Dan Hamburg doesn't believe the official version of
events.
Former
U.S. Republican Congressman and senior member of the House Armed Services
Committee, and who served six years as the Chairman of the Military Research
and Development Subcommittee Curt Weldon has shown that the U.S. tracked
hijackers before 9/11, is open to hearing information about explosives in
the Twin Towers, and is open to the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job.
If
there is bipartisan questioning of the official story, why isn't everyone questioning it?
Other
government officials:
U.S.
General, Commanding General of U.S. European Command and Supreme Allied
Commander Europe, decorated with the Bronze Star, Silver Star, and Purple Heart
(General Wesley Clark) said "We've never finished the investigation
of 9/11 and whether the administration actually misused the intelligence
information it had. The evidence seems pretty clear to me. I've seen that for a
long time"
Former
Deputy Secretary for Intelligence and Warning under Nixon, Ford, and Carter
(Morton Goulder), former Deputy Director to the White House Task Force on
Terrorism (Edward L. Peck), and former US Department of State Foreign Service
Officer (J. Michael Springmann), as well as a who's who of liberals and
independents) jointly called for a new investigation into 9/11.
Former
Federal Prosecutor, Office of Special Investigations, U.S. Department of
Justice under Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan; former U.S. Army
Intelligence officer, and currently a widely-sought media commentator on
terrorism and intelligence services (John Loftus) says "The
information provided by European intelligence services prior to 9/11 was so
extensive that it is no longer possible for either the CIA or FBI to assert a
defense of incompetence"
The
Group Director on matters of national security in the U.S. Government
Accountability Office said that President Bush did not respond to unprecedented
warnings of the 9/11 disaster and conducted a massive cover-up instead of
accepting responsibility.
Deputy
Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan (Col. Ronald D.
Ray) said that the official story of 9/11 is "the dog that doesn't
hunt"
The
former director of the FBI (Louis Freeh) says there was a cover up by the 9/11
Commission.
If
top government officials are skeptical, why isn't everyone ?
Numerous
other politicians, judges, legal scholars, and attorneys also question at least
some aspects of the government's version of 9/11.
David
Ray Griffin, perhaps the leading scholar in the 9/11 Truth movement, made a
plausible case in July in a 183-footnote open letter (http://www.ufppc.org/us-a-world-news-mainmenu-35/9849/)
for the view that "Among scientists and professionals in the
relevant fields who have studied the evidence, the weight of scientific and
professional opinion is now overwhelmingly on the side of the 9/11 Truth
Movement."
A
new 15-minute documentary narrated by actor Ed Asner features many 9/11Truth
experts, including structural engineers, chemical engineers, material
scientists, physicists, building demolition experts, firemen and others.
See
this remarkable documentary on YouTube:
And
finally, all the misinformation that became the 9/11 official story was laid
down by the US news media within minutes after the attack. Here's the ten
minute Video with those complete details: http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/92.html
Every
abuse of power by the Cheney/Bush administration can be traced to the 9/11
false storyline and cover up and we, as a
nation, will not be free until we fully investigate, uncover the evidence and
prosecute the perpetuators of America's greatest bamboozle ~ no matter how
difficult it may be to acknowledge this evil deed.
It
was Schopenhauer who wrote ~ “The truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed ~ Second, it is violently opposed and Third, it is
accepted as being self-evident.”
Eleven
years has elapsed since the events of September 11, 2001. There has been no
hard evidence linking the claims made by the 9/11 Commission to their
conclusions. Even the 9/11 Commission admits they have been lied to and "Set
up to fail".
It
is now self-evident that a missile hit the Pentagon; it is now
self-evident that all three trade towers were brought down by controlled
demolitions and it is now self-evident that Jonathan Briley and the
thousands of others who died on 9/11 will not rest until the full extent of the
9/11 false official storyline and cover up becomes self-evident and that the
true perpetrators and enablers are brought to justice.
In
that regard, the recent self-serving, deceptive and revisionist history books
by George W Bush, Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney should be reminders to all
Americans that the first casualty of war, and in particular illegal
pre-emptive wars, is the truth.
Jonathan
Briley deserves better ~
Allen
L Roland
Freelance
Alternative Press Online columnist and psychotherapist Allen L Roland is
available for comments, interviews, speaking engagements and private
consultations ( allen@allenroland.com )
America's big 9/11 lie will eventually be revealed and it will rock America to its very foundations.
ReplyDelete