Sunday, August 14, 2016



A leaked Hillary Clinton email confirms that the Obama administration, with Hillary at the helm,  orchestrated a civil war in Syria to benefit Israel.  See story ~


America's Cross of Iron speech was immortalized by President Eisenhower in 1953 as well as his farewell address to the nation in 1961 and he correctly predicted that with the accelerated rise of the Military/Industrial complex ~ mankind would eventually be hanging on a cross of Iron. That speech brought into focus  America's dark side military/Industrial/ Congressional complex as well as the stark reality of the election of a proven and committed War president in 2016 as well as the ominous realization that we have now firmly come face to face with the dark side of our consciousness: Allen L Roland, PhD   


There is no coming to consciousness without pain. People will do anything, no matter how absurd, in order to avoid facing their own Soul. One does not become enlightened by imagining figures of light, but by making the darkness conscious.”   Carl Jung


It was 1957/58 when I became a naval aviator and by 1961 I was an integral part of America's military/Industrial complex as an all-weather Interceptor fighter pilot stationed on the USS Ranger patrolling the South China Sea.


By 1962, when I left active duty and became a weekend warrior, I was beginning to question our military posture with the advent of the Vietnam War and most certainly after Kennedy's assassination in 1963.

I began to feel a new appreciation for Eisenhower's words of peace as well  as his forbidding warning in 1953.


Eisenhower's Cross of Iron Speech / YouTube / 3 minutes


By 1970 the country had seemingly lost hope and its moral bearings with the loss of key political and spiritual leaders ~ JFK assassinated in 1963,

RFK assassinated in June, 1968 and MLK assassinated in August, 1968


Richard Nixon was sworn in as president in January 1970 but the country had never fully recovered from the loss of JFK, RFK and Martin Luther King, Jr ~ we were in a state of moral apathy and perfect fodder for Nixon and Kissinger to manipulate our collective fears by bombing Cambodia and then Nixon increased domestic spying.


The rest is history, with successive Presidents but also an ever expanding Military/Industrial/Congressional complex ~  so now let's fast forward to the Obama years and in particular Hillary's role as secretary of State regarding the bombing of Libya and the fate of Gaddafi ;

'Alter Egos' Dissects Hillary Clinton's Tenure As Obama's Secretary Of State

April 25, 2016 1:31 PM ET

Heard on Fresh Air

Mark Landler of The New York Times discusses Clinton and Obama's contrasting views on America's role in the world. Clinton, Landler says, was often the hawk, more willing to intervene with force.

GROSS: This is FRESH AIR. I'm Terry Gross. Let's get back to the interview FRESH AIR contributor Dave Davies recorded with Mark Landler, author of the new book "Alter Egos: Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama And The Twilight Struggle Over American Power." Landler covered Clinton when she was President Obama's secretary of state and Landler was covering the State Department for The New York Times. Landler is now a White House correspondent for The Times.

DAVIES: As you read the book, you realize what tough decisions these people faced, one of them being whether to intervene in Libya militarily against Moammar Gadhafi's forces when they were moving against the opposition in that country following the Arab Spring. Take us through that debate. How did these players state their cases?

LANDLER: Well, this was a very good illustration of the kind of role that Hillary Clinton could play in some of these great debates over war and peace. Again, as I said earlier, she was traveling around Europe during this period hearing from the Europeans, hearing from Arabs, neighbors of Libya of how bad the situation was and the risks killing of real atrocities in Benghazi. Gadhafi had promised to hunt down the rebels house by house like rats. So that was the kind of backdrop, and that was the message that Clinton was getting.

Back in Washington, President Obama was characteristically reluctant. He didn't view Libya as a core strategic interest of the United States in the way, perhaps, that France and Britain did in Europe. And he was backed up, in this case, by his defense secretary, by Bob Gates who also didn't view it as enough of a reason to get involved in yet another war in the Middle East.

But Hillary Clinton made a very strong case. She wasn't alone in making that case. Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the U.N. made that case as did Samantha Power, who at that time was an NSC official who thought a lot about human rights issues. And so he was - he the president - was being faced by these fervent proponents of a military intervention to avert this genocide in Benghazi.

But it was really Hillary Clinton who carried the day who made the most persuasive case dialing into a White House meeting from Europe where she had just met with one of the heads of the rebel government who told her how bad things were, and also she was able to cobble together support from enough Arab countries that she felt that the U.S. had enough legitimacy to take part in this mission.

And so this was a critical moment where she really, I think, carried the day over Gates and others, and then in turn set the stage for a military intervention that has, of course, had an extremely bloody aftermath with lots of misgivings and second-guessing on President Obama's part, and one that's even shadowed her into her current election campaign - lots of questions asked about whether Libya was worth it, was it mishandled, did the U.S. not go in afterwards the way we should have? So these are all questions that played out of that fateful decision.

DAVIES: Yeah, you know, the president's maxim, don't do stupid stuff, partly reflected, you know, his view of the Iraq War where the United States went in without a plan for what would happen once Saddam Hussein was deposed.

In Libya, there was no plan for the United States to move in with much of anything, right? And Obama was clearly concerned about that. What happened after Gadhafi fell?

LANDLER: Well, this in effect, Obama was trying to learn the lessons of past interventions, you know, both positive and negative. During the Clinton years, the U.S. waited a long time before intervening in Srebrenica, and there was a terrible slaughter there.

In Iraq, the U.S. intervened full force, went in and really occupied the country with all the mayhem that played out there. So in a way, the president was trying to learn these lessons and get intervention right, intervene to avert a slaughter, a mass killing but not send in tens of thousands of troops or American advisers, not attempt to rebuild the nation of Libya.

The problem was by not doing that, there was an enormous security vacuum in Libya when Gadhafi finally fell and lots of militias some with ties to al-Qaida or ISIS basically swept into that vacuum and turned Libya into, you know, a very lethal place, a place that's really awash in guns and feuding militias and fighting.

And so as the president has looked back on this experience, I think he views it very much as kind of confirming all his worst suspicions. He told Bob Gates it was a 51 - 49 decision whether to do this, and he's been very frank in the aftermath that, you know, he regrets the way it played out."

                   *                  *

And here is War Hawk Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton laughing and stating "We came, We saw and He died" when former Libya head of State Muammar Ghaddafi was brutally assassinated which is certainly not compassionate or presidential and most unsettling to our dictator friends and most certainly Clinton foundation donors ~ see video


Sean Adl-Tabatabai / Your News Wire – TRANSCEND Media Service reports on August 8, 2016 ~ that  the new recent Wikileaks release shows the then Secretary of State ordering a war in Syria in order to overthrow the government and oust President Assad, claiming it was the “best way to help Israel”.

"The document was one of many unclassified by the US Department of State under case number F-2014-20439, Doc No. C05794498, following the uproar over Clinton’s private email server kept at her house while she served as Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013.

Although the Wikileaks transcript dates the email as December 31, 2000, this is an error on their part, as the contents of the email (in particular the reference to May 2012 talks between Iran and the west over its nuclear program in Istanbul) show that the email was in fact sent on December 31, 2012.

The email makes it clear that it has been US policy from the very beginning to violently overthrow the Syrian government ~ and specifically to do this because it is in Israel’s interests."  See Transcend article ~


And speaking of the Clinton Foundation ~ with help from Jonathan Turley and Doug Childers.

"The Clinton Foundation has been the subject of long-standing allegations of questionable donations and reporting. It is also viewed by many critics as a massive shadow campaign structure that employed aides and funded Clinton trips

However, the most serious allegation was a type of pay-to-play scheme where foreign and domestic donors gave money in the hopes of currying favor or gaining access to the State Department.

Now, Judicial Watch has released dozens of emails that were deleted improperly by the Clinton staff, but contain non-personal communications.

Among the recovered emails are communications showing interventions for donors at the State Department, including one on behalf of a convicted money launderer. The relative lack of coverage on both the proof of the improper deletion of such emails and the pay-for-play concerns is astonishing ~ and magnify concerns that mainstream media has been giving such controversies minimal coverage."

See Turley article ~

James Grimaldi, Pulitzer Winning Journalist (WSJ)  gives a detailed report to Democracy Today and Amy Goodman on the obvious conflicts of interest with the Clintons and Clinton Foundation ~ many while Hillary was Secretary of State.  See Video Report ~

With the help of Doug Childers regarding the spiritual meaning of these developments  ~ I’ve only done a cursory reading of articles on the Clinton Foundation, but I’m not as informed as I could be. But the list I’ve gotten from sources I respect is that the Foundation is a criminal money-making, money-laundering, bribery based organization posing as a humanitarian operation ~ but, for all intent and purposes, it appears to be another highly visible slow speed chase by the Feds.


I did read about how the Clintons went into Haiti and made a fortune under the pretense of doing service, of which they did very little. And I know about Hillary helping the Haiti government negotiate a poverty minimum wage of thirty something cents an hour instead of the sixty-something cents an hour representatives of the Haitian people were trying to get. And I’ve been reading and hearing lately that the Clinton Foundation connections have infiltrated into every branch and aspect of the U.S. government and other governments as well.


The upshot being that no one dares to go after them because if they go down they’ll take much of the government with them. You probably know that the head of the FBI who declined to charge Hillary for the email fiasco was a board member, I think, for the Clinton Foundation or some branch of it.


So my understanding is that the Clinton Foundation is an unparalleled phenomena in all the above respects, a kind of vast parasitic organization feeding off of the total corrupt system we currently have. The revelations of this past year have been truly astounding ~ particularly by WikiLeaks ~ I’ve never seen anything like it.


But my spiritual sense is that it is the necessary revelation of the shadow that precedes a collective awakening that has to happen for things to change. As such, Donald Trump is a false flag distraction to humor, feed and distract the public and Main Stream press as well as  protect the Clinton foundation from close scrutiny.


As Andy Borowitz satirically writes in the New Yorker : "Clarifying his position on a key national-security issue, Donald Trump said on Friday that as President he would be willing to use nuclear weapons, ' but meant it only in a sarcastic way.'"


In that sense, Trump is not a threat and should not be taken seriously but should be seen only as a distraction, perhaps encouraged by the Clintons themselves ~ and it will become obvious, as Maureen Dowd explains today in the New York Times, that the GOP already has the perfect candidate for President;

"All these woebegone Republicans whining that they can’t rally behind their flawed candidate is crazy. The G.O.P. angst, the gnashing and wailing and searching for last-minute substitutes and exit strategies, is getting old.

They already have a 1-percenter who will be totally fine in the Oval Office, someone they can trust to help Wall Street, boost the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, cuddle with hedge funds, secure the trade deals beloved by corporate America, seek guidance from Henry Kissinger and hawk it up ~  unleashing hell on Syria and heaven knows where else.

The Republicans have their candidate: It’s Hillary."

You know Jung’s saying that about making the darkness conscious"  ~ or more palatable and it's obvious the Clintons have made the darkness more than obvious with their deceptive track record, fabrications and Clinton Foundation.


It appears that everyone in political power has their price and can be marginalized such as the recent silencing of Bernie Sanders by the Clinton Machine and his subsequent purchasing of a $600,000 vacation home on Lake Champaign ~ after endorsing Hillary for President ~ connect the dots and realize we are sinking fast in a moral toilet.


As the collective awareness of all that has been and continues to be revealed, including our dark side, a shift in the collective psyche of America is occurring that will be decisive ~ and a new consciousness will eventually fuel a dynamic activism that can eventually topple the global corporate/military state that has been running things from behind a closed curtain for decades.


That curtain is slowly opening but unfortunately we may have to live with the dark side of Hillary's cross of iron ~ much as you must embrace fear to transcend it ~ before we can truly embrace the light at the end of that dark tunnel as well as our place in a Unified Field of love and soul consciousness that lies not only beyond time and space but also beneath our deepest fears ~ and whose principle property is the universal urge to unite which we continue to ignore at our collective peril.


There are other clear strident voices which must be heard before November 4th and hopefully that includes the Green Party's Jill Stein whose progressive voice must be heard at the upcoming Presidential debates ~ see


But before the dawn of a new age must come the darkness of apathy and despair ~ for we are all now unfortunately hanging from and bearing the consequences of the Bush, Obama and now Clinton cross of Iron. And for all intent and purposes, there is only one party ~ The War party.



"The day will come when, after mastering the ether, the winds, the tides, gravity, we shall master the energies of love, for God. And then, for the second time in the history of the world, man will have made fire his servant."  Teilhard de Chardin, The Evolution of Chasity (unpublished)



Allen L Roland, PhD

Heart centered spiritual consultant and advisor Allen L Roland can be contacted at Allen is also a lecturer and writer who shares a weekly political and social commentary on his web log and website He is also featured columnist on Veterans Today and is a featured guest on many radio and Television programs

1 comment:

  1. “War is peace.
    Freedom is slavery.
    Ignorance is strength.”
    ― George Orwell, 1984